George Agapov
George Agapov
!ci-nightly-me
!ci-nightly-me
!ci-nightly-me
_Script is failing for SLOT_TX_END=96, investigating..._ ``` Assertion failed: unexpected ledgers in fork_config Expected: {"epoch_data":{"next":{"hash":"jxr7A4HxsmHE3FNGKAWkqMCCnMUz8h3nLcCMTivg2DsnbF4v8oK"},"staking":{"hash":"jwXSSgY7yr4SekrqSt1KCUupW1nmk8iHcvyeLmoPdLy7H3jJdNt"}},"ledger":{"hash":"jxy776EYq5JBmsa5ozcrdGFrFaCSgdsiXP5Cu9qXSDZ8q9W3j6x"}} ``` Actual (from _prefork_hf_ledger_hashes.json_): ``` {"ledger":{"hash":"jxy776EYq5JBmsa5ozcrdGFrFaCSgdsiXP5Cu9qXSDZ8q9W3j6x"},"epoch_data":{"staking":{"hash":"jxrtiogqQ1s8kMruG1uTE71zzAsaZLUwVLonaSbHx8SL64FL1AB"},"next":{"hash":"jwXSSgY7yr4SekrqSt1KCUupW1nmk8iHcvyeLmoPdLy7H3jJdNt"}}} ``` I.e. expected staking ledger equals to actually produced...
In addition to what's currently being checked in PR #14987, also check that: 1. Fork config has correct height, slot and state hash (referring to the last block happening **before**...
!ci-build-me
!ci-build-me
@nholland94 could you explain your motivation for the change https://github.com/MinaProtocol/mina/pull/15195/files#diff-4639a9ab80fa8921be722da5501c054606e7c4cea41eab2134f9669492f052ee (part of #15195)? It is the reason for test `bad_version_syntax_missing_versioned` failing. AFAIU, we do not check for `%%versioned` wrapping existence...
PR also contains upstream merge of `berkeley` to `develop`. Only conflict was in `MinaArtifact.dhall`, due to the fact that hardfork pipeline is not present in `develop`.