Georg Mayr-Duffner

> > Like the implemented solution for narrative citations, the solution should not hinder switching between note styles and parenthetical styles. > > Concerning this: That's not trivial to achieve....

> For supporting this, the question is what exactly is needed. The most consistent with existing CSL style design might be to add an attribute to `cs:layout` to specify `always-in-text`;...

> @georgd Can you give some actual in context examples of these citations? I amended the initial post. I haven’t found live examples in a quick search so I added...

> Regular and narrative citations really do cover the vast vast majority of citation cases. I don't anticipate deciding that this solution doesn't work. > > The types of citation...

> The problem is just that those tests will have to be added to each style right? No, I explicitly don’t see this as an aim at the moment. For...

Now, that’s difficult to say. Considering you don’t want to replace CSLm for juridic styles but want to improve citing legal material in "general purpose" styles, I think adding this...

Again, this doesn’t aim at adding the whole bunch of complex features required for legal citation to CSL. That is well served in CSLm. This is about adding a functionality...

I think, `@related` is indispensable on `cs:text[@variable]`and on `cs:group`. Allowing it on `cs:text[@macro]` calls might prove useful if that element is the only one of the related item to be...

> > Allowing it on cs:text[@macro] calls might prove useful if that element is the only one of the related item to be called at that place, so using a...

> How is that different from reprint information? The semantics don’t fit at all, of course — a reprint doesn’t change the contents, whereas an amendment explicitly does. > Or...