Georg Mayr-Duffner

I’m sorry, but looking at the overall complexity, I think 'map input to output' is really a minor problem.

As for the two Austrian legal citation styles: they actually do recommend the use of ECLI for citing legal cases and propose a specific format for citations when the ECLI...

For a more complete picture: The majority of the EU member states have implemented or plan to implement the ECLI. In addition, the European Court of Justice, the European Court...

@p-heckler thanks for the link. Interestingly, the only examples that show the identifier are those of the Court of Justice. All the others in the "règles de rédaction des sources...

I wouldn’t compare ECLI to an archival location, it’s much more like a reporter locator – in the case of the European Court of Justice it has become the single...

> My opinion is that standard CSL should generally not expand its support for legal citation outside of what is already there. My sense is that the legal support there...

> Specifically on the issue of multi-jurisdiction support, I do not think it would be a good situation to end up with many unique CSL styles duplicating conditional jurisdiction logic...

> > I’m sorry, but that’s not the reality. EU statutes are an integral part of every EU member’s legislation. Thus, citing Austrian law may mean citing EU statutes. EU...

> > * Parallel legal citation is outside the scope of CSL > > * Multiple-jurisdiction legal citation is outside the scope of CSL > > Regarding the apparent complexity...

> What kind of differences are there across jurisdictions? Minor or major? What do they look like? > […](#) - Austrian statute: - in Bibliography: IVF-Fonds-Gesetz, BGBl I 1999/180 idF...