ME: edit record distributions

[LHBruneton-C2C]

Description

This PR introduces the section on associated resources, allowing to add both download and service as distributions.

TODO: split and share components between annexes and associated resources.

Screenshots

Quality Assurance Checklist

• [X] Commit history is devoid of any merge commits and readable to facilitate reviews
• [ ] If new logic ⚙️ is introduced: unit tests were added
• [X] If new user stories 🤏 are introduced: E2E tests were added
• [ ] If new UI components 🕹️ are introduced: corresponding stories in Storybook were created
• [ ] If breaking changes 🪚 are introduced: add the breaking change label
• [ ] If bugs 🐞 are fixed: add the backport <release branch> label
• [ ] The documentation website 📚 has received the love it deserves

[github-actions[bot]]

Affected libs: feature-editor, ui-inputs, feature-dataviz, feature-record, feature-router, feature-search, feature-map, ui-elements, feature-notifications, feature-catalog, ui-catalog, ui-search, ui-layout, Affected apps: metadata-editor, datafeeder, demo, metadata-converter, datahub, webcomponents, search, map-viewer,

• [ ] 🚀 Build and deploy storybook and demo on GitHub Pages
• [ ] 📦 Build and push affected docker images

[github-actions[bot]]

📷 Screenshots are here!

[jahow]

Did a quick test and found this:

• When trying to upload a file as a distribution, this error appears in the console and nothing happens: ; same for the "attached resources" field below actually

• When clicking on the main block, the upload file dialog doesn't open

Otherwise looks good! thanks!

[fvanderbiest]

Just chiming in - "OGC API" title is misleading because there are so many OGC APIs (OGC API Maps, Features, Tiles...) Have a look at https://ogcapi.ogc.org/#standards

[jahow]

Just chiming in - "OGC API" title is misleading because there are so many OGC APIs (OGC API Maps, Features, Tiles...) Have a look at https://ogcapi.ogc.org/#standards

On the other hand it makes sense because an OGC API endpoint can provide many different information at the same place I think

[coveralls]

coverage: 81.027% (-3.9%) from 84.949% when pulling 177e6ab86e81861f52a5d898350650c342798918 on ME/record-field-distributions into be9519760a3db6038a0730e203c8178aa5c7a1af on main.