List of future cookbooks

[jdannberg]

It would be good to have a list of things that need more documentation, so that people who have experience with that part of ASPECT could write a cookbook when they have the time (it could be similar to the starter projects). So let's compile a list of cookbooks we want to do in the future. Please add to this list whatever you think we need! I think @gassmoeller had a number of things in mind that need more documentation...

• [ ] cookbook using thermodynamically consistent data (#2063)
• [ ] subduction cookbook (#1828)
• [ ] Stabilization (#1039)
• [ ] Particles (#942)
• [ ] dG method (#725)
• [x] mid-ocean ridge cookbook
• [ ] post-glacial rebound
• [ ] simple accretionary wedge cookbook
• [ ] anisotropic viscosity cookbook
• [x] cookbook that explains how to use the Newton solver
• [ ] early Mars convection cookbook (@SiqiZhang provided a material model and a data file for this, so that could be a place to start)
• [ ] 2D Convection Rolls cookbook from Turcotte/Schubert, "Geodynamics" (suggested by @egpuckett in issue #1027)

[ljhwang]

I recall starting a “network” diagram at last year’s hack that I think was suppose to aid in this issue.

Best, -Lorraine

---

Lorraine Hwang, Ph.D. Associate Director, CIG 530.752.3656

On Feb 22, 2018, at 11:54 AM, Juliane Dannberg [email protected] wrote:

It would be good to have a list of things that need more documentation, so that people who have experience with that part of ASPECT could write a cookbook when they have the time (it could be similar to the starter projects). So let's compile a list of cookbooks we want to do in the future. Please add to this list whatever you think we need! I think @gassmoeller https://github.com/gassmoeller had a number of things in mind that need more documentation...

cookbook using thermodynamically consistent data (#2063 https://github.com/geodynamics/aspect/issues/2063) subduction cookbook (#1828 https://github.com/geodynamics/aspect/issues/1828) Stabilization (#1039 https://github.com/geodynamics/aspect/issues/1039) Particles (#942 https://github.com/geodynamics/aspect/issues/942) dG method (#725 https://github.com/geodynamics/aspect/issues/725) mid-ocean ridge cookbook — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/geodynamics/aspect/issues/2110, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AESQXwwZChZtZcJaiyz311q7iyoq-FRdks5tXcXdgaJpZM4SP4-6.

[jdannberg]

Yes, that would definitely be helpful for this, thanks for reminding us, @ljhwang! I recall that @bangerth should have all the code/data/output of what you did. @bangerth, can we somehow get that into the manual?

[arijitlaik]

A simple Accretionary wedge cookbook would definitely help me out, with boundary conditions like this(in 2d):

[naliboff]

@arijitlaik - That is from the Ruh et al. 2013 G3 paper, yes? We can certainly try setting up this problem in 2D and 3D. Would you like to discuss this in a separate "issue" or offline initially? It may be easier to use a free surface verse sticky air, but other than that I don't see any reason this can't be done. Not having a moving wall makes the problem much easier.

[naliboff]

@jdannberg - Thanks for starting this list. Another cookbook that would a number of people have requested is a post-glacial rebound type problem. This should be straightforward after viscoelasticity is finished.

[arijitlaik]

@naliboff its from the Ruh et al. 2013 G3, i should have mentoned it there, i have been trying to model these types of geometries and have been fairly successful in implementing them in Underworld(sticky air, without surface diffusion) and in SiStER(sticky air with linear surface difusion), I would definitely like to be in loop with constructing these types of models and share my already constructed models, in an issue or via email laikarijit_at_gmail_dot_com.

[naliboff]

@arijitlaik - great, let's take the discussion off github until we have a few concrete results to report back with. There may be a few rounds of trying various things to get reasonable convergence behavior. If others would like the full discussion to take place via a new issue, happy to do so and please let us know.