go-annotation icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
go-annotation copied to clipboard

Review annotations to GO:0043621 protein self-association and GO:0032840 intramolecular proline-rich ligand binding

Open edwong57 opened this issue 11 months ago • 12 comments

Dear all,

The proposal has been made to obsolete GO:0043621 protein self-association and GO:0032840 intramolecular proline-rich ligand binding see https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/27101

Experimental annotations that need to be reviewed are here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/14eHLs7s81y_pUziDB58dtUfv244dNd2lZodeJAJ0OZs/edit?usp=sharing

Impacted groups:

AgBase 14 BHF-UCL 7 - UCL done ~CAFA 9~ done FlyBase 3 MGI 22 RGD 11 TAIR 55 ~UniProt 153~ done ~WB 14~ done ZFIN 1 dictyBase 3

Thanks.

edwong57 avatar Mar 15 '24 22:03 edwong57

FB done

hattrill avatar Mar 15 '24 22:03 hattrill

RGD done

gthayman avatar Mar 18 '24 20:03 gthayman

"capture mechanistic information about binding"

To which term/s are people moving their annotations? examples are welcome so we know where to start

Or are you getting rid of the annotations altogether?

@gthayman @hattrill

tberardini avatar Mar 20 '24 22:03 tberardini

I'm interested to know what different groups are doing; I was assuming these were being moved to 'protein binding'.

pgaudet avatar Mar 21 '24 06:03 pgaudet

@tberardini @pgaudet I've deleted them. We've made a decision that we should stop capturing terms that describe self-association and terms like this that describe homomultimerization/stoichiometry - we already have a curator working on capturing pair-wise physical interactions (and complex portal and IntAct are also doing similar). Plus, in the MF domain, it doesn't say much about what the protein does.

hattrill avatar Mar 21 '24 08:03 hattrill

protein self-association sounds like a very strange term "Binding to a domain within the same polypeptide" ...isn't that just forming the protein tertiary structure?

Antonialock avatar Mar 21 '24 10:03 Antonialock

uniprot and cafa done. It seemed to be a grab bag of intra and inter self-association, some redundant with intact. It didn't seem like we'd lose much from letting go of them.

Antonialock avatar Mar 21 '24 11:03 Antonialock

ZFIN done

sramachand avatar Mar 26 '24 15:03 sramachand

@tberardini if we don't do anything when the term is obsoleted the annotations would be obsoleted Since there is nothing to replace this with I am inclined to not do anything and let the terms and annotations expire.

lreiser avatar Mar 27 '24 19:03 lreiser

@lreiser I'm ok with having the annotations expire. RIP annotations.

tberardini avatar Mar 27 '24 21:03 tberardini

MGI done

LiNiMGI avatar Apr 29 '24 13:04 LiNiMGI

WB done

vanaukenk avatar Apr 29 '24 13:04 vanaukenk

These terms were obsoleted; remaining annotations will appear in GORULES error reports

suzialeksander avatar Aug 12 '24 23:08 suzialeksander