Phoebe Goldman
Phoebe Goldman
Please separate the bugfix from the new feature. These should be separate PRs.
Is the `no_run` necessary, or just the `mod demo` part?
Is there anything we can do about this?
> Add hooks to let users add custom behavior when connection is lost. The Rust SDK allows custom behavior on disconnecting as of #235 . > Possibly perform some sort...
> I was mainly wondering if the client is going to see the entire client cache deleted and then re-added on reconnect. Hmm, this is something for which we'll need...
See https://github.com/clockworklabs/SpacetimeDBPrivate/blob/master/proposals/0026-module-and-sdk-api/02-physical-queries.md#reserved-column-and-index-accessor-names and https://github.com/clockworklabs/SpacetimeDBPrivate/blob/master/proposals/0026-module-and-sdk-api/05-user-defined-reducers.md#reserved-reducer-names . We have no plans to reserve any other words at this time. Notably we *do not* want to reserve the words reserved by the SQL...
We think we can get this in as a "bugfix" down the line, even though it will technically be a breaking change. We definitely can't get it into 1.0.
Combining them into a single struct is challenging because it prevents the `scheduled_id` from being auto-inc.
"Compile and upload fine" seems like a strong claim. I don't think it will eagerly error during `publish`, but neither do I think it will result in a functioning module/db.
After discussion with @kim , we intend to revise this PR. (The test will stay unchanged.) Before inserting anything into the control DB, or saving the WASM blob to the...