OpenWeedLocator icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
OpenWeedLocator copied to clipboard

Compact OWL model defects / printability issues

Open MisterHW opened this issue 9 months ago • 1 comments

Compact OWL as of https://github.com/geezacoleman/OpenWeedLocator/tree/68f2ee177ff4bf59b490357e216150cbcec619c8/3D%20Models/Compact%20OWL has a few issues affecting printability and the function of the o-ring face seals.

tray.stl

The bottom of the model is not flat, leading to most of the area not being exactly on the print bed

main-body.stl

The profile presents as a multi-part stl. Older slicers don't fuse everything into a single object, which causes the rails to be pinted separately, and they may or may not be bonded to the profile.

image

failed test print section:

photo_2024-05-13_17-24-34

frontplate.stl

The o-ring groove does not follow the main body cross-section.

oV16mYDv

partial recreation in FreeCAD

FreeCAD may not be the best choice for a redo, but I've recreated the extrusion profile and a blind end cap (which can then be cloned and specialized). This ought to give a glimpse into the workflow and level of hassle when using this particular CAD program.

OWL Compact FreeCAD example (plus 3mf, step).zip

image

Here's another view of the end cap with o-ring groove. It's not dimensioned absolutely correctly.

Note: 3D printed parts can be expected to exhibit some level of creep, especially since there is a heat source inside. Therefore, it's probably best to use Shore 15 EPDM foam o-ring material and a conservative amount of compression. Since the flat areas around the M5 holes butt up against main body, it's the depth of the groove w.r.t. this plane.

image

MisterHW avatar May 13 '24 19:05 MisterHW