Gerardo Ravago

Results 26 comments of Gerardo Ravago

With PR #161, the OQS-v9 branch is now at parity with OQS-v8 and we should be able to close out this issue now. I'll leave it open for now as...

I did a first pass, but still need to go through how the buffering works and how we handle the padding/non-padding cases. I normally don't like to police commit messages...

> I think I've answered all your comments. Yes, I see it all in the code. To clarify though, I was really hoping to see some of these design decisions...

I'm open to the idea, but what is your use case? If we were to do this, it shouldn't be used for any kind of assertion. Perhaps just for logging...

I've done a partial pass, here's the feedback so far.