Greg Troxel
Greg Troxel
I am 99% sure the UV index is not constrained to integers. Precision greater than 0.1 does not really seem useful, so .1 seems good to me.
> > I am 99% sure the UV index is not constrained to integers. Precision greater than 0.1 does not really seem useful, so .1 seems good to me. >...
> An index that more or less goes from 0 to 12 using 0.1 does not seem silly. I would agree that 0.01 is unlikely to make sense. I just...
> So the integer rounding of most other stations seems sensible to me, as it at least doesn't give the impression of a false accuracy, which isn't really there with...
> > Can you confirm or improve on the derived linear formula to replace the indexed mapping? > > The only other thing I'm getting more and more confused with...
Generally, rtl_433 doctrine is to round to the actual resolution of the device. UV Index appears to be a real number kind of quantity, and for a device that receives...
I think it's been argued well that it's just a real number. I'm +1 for the normalization of names you describe.
@MatthewRuddy Where are we on this? There's a PR to add support. My question as ticket gardener: is there any useful information in the issue that is not in the...
No reply for 9 months.
Reading again, I think this is an answered question.