Guillaume Dalle
Guillaume Dalle
Hey @cscherrer, Just added the logp parametrization, and realized the `sortperm` may not be a worry since the values are a range type: judging by a little `@benchmark`, sorting `p`...
Honestly I haven't touched this in years so I better let @cscherrer answer
See #145
Hey there @sethaxen! I wanted to do that too in order to simulate Poisson processes on a given set, but I was going to make the relevant measures callable: something...
After some more thinking, I feel like it the notion of total mass is intimately linked with the subset we consider. If we want to integrate (numerically) a measure on...
So where does that leave us? I'm a bit lost as to what to implement
Possibly fixed by #32
Here is an example of benchmark that shows the promise of this idea https://gdalle.github.io/FastPriorityQueues.jl/dev/benchmarks/ ping @etiennedeg if you want to add some more tests when you have time
It doesn't cost much to define `dijkstra!(queue, ...)` internally and then add a default choice
See https://discourse.julialang.org/t/fast-er-priority-queues/81269 for a discussion and some benchmarks