gbaz
(or rather, it might create the lockfile while setting up the init, but that file should be removed afterwards I believe)
Added a test, but it succeeds even when it should fail because I can't set the env to not have ghc in the path properly somehow. Setting it to Nothing...
As per our discussion in the meeting, we don't seem to be able to test with an altered path missing ghc, so I've rolled back the not-working tests and we'll...
good thought, but i just tried that and that didn't work either. Terribly confusing.
Certainly a squash -- I was hoping to update the docs first, but will not be able to get to it until next week.
@Mikolaj added changelog and docs. Please do squash/merge!
I think that find code is correct. However, I think the link should not be in the versions listing. Rather, it should be either above or below the modules listing...
Which `OtherLicense` in particular are you trying to use?
as per the discussion here, spdx lets you specify directly WTFPL as a license if you use `cabal-version: 2.2`: https://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/87t7nn/releasing_packages_as_public_domain_creative/ However, wtfpl isn't osi approved, and I think the current...
My problem is really that changing license policy should have been done by a hackage admin/trustee decision rather than the process we followed, where we didn't get to have that...