Victor Gaydov

@soggycactus hi, you're welcome! It's not done yet.

Hi, not at all. Only regular http requests and assertions for http header and json body are available currently, plus websocket support.

Personally I don't have any plans on that. However probably this would be an eligible feature. I guess we could implement an alternative request builder for graphql and reuse existing...

@gtourkas Sure, you're welcome!

Thanks for your patience :)

@Leryan Thanks for your interest, the help is appreciated! You could help with finishing this PR, I hope @goku321 don't mind. After this is done, it would be possible to...

> why not pointer to Context and Failure structs for Failure method of Formatter interface? It was just a pseudo-code. We can use pointers of course if we need to.

> Also, would it make sense to keep Failure struct inside Context? What do you mean by "inside"?

> What do you mean by "inside"? Ah, I guess you suggest to add a Failure field to Context. Well, I think that Formatter interface will be cleaner if context...

If we're adding xml builder (`WithXML`), which is trivial, we should also add xml assertions, which is not so trivial. We currently have assertions designed for JSON types (value, object,...