Results 1654 comments of Gabriel Scherer

For `foo.bar.cmo` are we sure that the previous compiler would only look at `foo.cmi`, and not also `foo.bar.cmi`? If we wanted to support both positions as possible, would we end...

I propose to fix the bug first in a way that is acceptable -- I think that merging the PR as-is (with the typo fixed) is reasonable and good enough...

@Octachron I'm not fond of #12988 as a proposed fix to this issue. My understanding is that when there are several choices that are just as good (from the algorithm's...

Thanks for the report. From the discuss discussion, it sounds like @dra27 successfully diagnosed the problem as follows: `.cmi` digests are different depending on whether zstd compression is enabled or...

(cc @MisterDA : a juicy change in the marshaller could be of interest to you)

In principle the change looks fine, I think this only needs a review for reasonableness and non-regression inside the type checker.

If I understand correctly, @Octachron did a substantial change just now, and we need a second review round of @lthls (or someone else) before we can merge.

@Octachron tried to do something "good" for this check in #10386, but I don't remember why it went nowhere -- except maybe "it's complex and no one knowledgeable was around...