Gary Burgess

I guess it save the allocation of one lambda? Just wondered if there were any other reasons to prefer the current version. For reference, I'm talking about this as the...

Either by compiling this with the haskell version, or ideally compiling this with a version of `ps-in-ps` from npm I guess. Probably need to do #17 first for this to...

...as far as I can tell anyway, pretty weird.

Make `unionWith` more flexible

13

As per @fehrenbach in https://github.com/purescript/purescript-ordered-collections/pull/5#discussion_r219065421: ``` purescript unionWith :: forall k a b c. Ord k => (a -> b -> c) -> Map k a -> Map k b...

List.Lazy insertAt, modifyAt, updateAt, deleteAt, alterAt members behave differently to List and Array

3

They always return a `List a` even when the index is out of range, whereas the other modules return a `Maybe (List a)` or `Array (List a)` for when the...

- [ ] some - [ ] many - [ ] sort - [ ] sortBy - [ ] group' - [x] replicate - [x] replicateM - [x] snoc -...

Merge `Effect` and `ST`

25

This is a idea for the future, floated by @natefaubion when we were talking about #30. `ST` and `Effect` have the same implementation, and it should be possible to coerce...

Remove `STRef`, unify with `Ref`

9

Now there's the `Global` region, `MonadST`, etc. we can do away with having two `Ref` types: - Rework `Ref` in `purescript-refs` to include `Region` (basically, `STRef` -> `Ref`) - Introduce...

And probably the `Comonad` version rather than the `Traversable` version.