Gary Burgess

I definitely appreciate the effort that went into this, and agree something like this is the right direction, but I think I'd rather keep it dumb and accepting anything in...

That'd be great, thanks.

Yeah, I think so - or it might not even be necessary at all really. I was thinking of providing a type that just lifts any `Monad`, since it's the...

Maybe take it out for now, yeah. I do still intend to update it, but I think like `purescript-dom` it probably would be better to build things on top of...

What are you using to build the project currently? If you're using gulp or grunt you can integrate a browserify step into the project the "usual" way there ([example gruntfile...

No you're absolutely right, and actually I'm surprised you've not run into problems with other libraries yet. I think generally we have a "getting started" problem in PS at the...

Thanks!

It depends on the `Eq` instance for the type :) But yeah, that will be "deep" equality.

When working with `virtual-dom` in JS usually this is done via `ev-*` properties in `virtual-hyperscript` and including `dom-delegator` to hook them up. I'm not sure yet what the best approach...

PhantomJS would probably be your best bet for testing, although it's not without its own flaws.