Andrew Downes
Andrew Downes
Thanks for the extra detail. I don't have a definitive answer to this and I'd encourage you to try a few things out to see what ends up working. If...
There's not a situation where the client has to figure out if what is received is a single statement or statement result object as this is determined by the parameters...
The LRS and client are able to use additional headers not defined in the spec. Cookies aren't covered at all, but i can't see any problem with the LRS using...
@rchadwic @andyjohnson I think this is a question. Can it be tagged as a question and closed?
For next patch version: note the security concern and suggest that LRSs return the document as plain text. For 2.0 LRS may reject documents of content type HTML
@bscSCORM good point, yes.
@rmlowe thanks for clarifying that. I was conflating the two attacks when I created this issue so edited it yesterday to try and clarify that it's the second issue ('a...
Just to clarify, are you aiming to get launching from an LMS included as part of 1.0 by 26th April or is the aim to get something separate from the...
Any reason why your launch mechanism can't be used by CMI5? bscSCORM [email protected] wrote: I think it would be really bad to come up with three incompatible launch mechanisms. (ours,...
As I understand it, CMI5 is aiming for September currently, but that's far from set it stone. Bret Weinraub [email protected] wrote: > I would think the xAPI working group should...