Gaëlle Fournier
Gaëlle Fournier
I think this is still relevant.
Can you assign this one to me @squakez please. I will see how to continue this subject.
I was waiting for advancement on https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/3397. But I wonder if I should not continue again because [#3397](https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/3397) looks like a long time development
That looks like a good idea but I wonder how would we work the default probe path on non-quarkus runtime ? As it is activating by default the health trait...
@squakez I will work on it.
The first point was done but not the second. I can create another issue with the refactoring and then we can close this one.
Nice work. Just missing some documentation update: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/blob/7eed52ab3919cdb7537eb503b19ae7dd2f8e90dc/pkg/apis/camel/v1/trait/health.go#L22
That could be a good idea but I don't know much on the `prometheus` trait. Please feel free to open an issue on that @mertdotcc to explain what you expect...
That is a good proposal to improve our freedom to improve the traits but we would need to provide an alternative way to offer a schema for the tooling. I...
This is in progress since it is linked to #5211