test(MeshRenderer): update unit test case of MeshRenderer

[jtabibito]

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

• [ ] The commit message follows our guidelines
• [ ] Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
• [ ] Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)

What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)

What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR?)

Other information:

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests
  • Enhanced the test suite for the MeshRenderer component with multiple new test cases.
  • Added validations for material management and shadow reception functionalities.
  • Expanded tests for setMaterial, getMaterial, setMaterials, and getMaterials methods.
  • Introduced checks for materialCount and instance materials retrieval.
  • Validated the behavior of the priority property under various scenarios.

[coderabbitai[bot]]

Walkthrough

The changes enhance the test suite for the MeshRenderer component by introducing several new test cases. These tests cover the receiveShadows property, various material management methods (setMaterial, getMaterial, setMaterials, and getMaterials), and validate the materialCount and priority properties. The updates ensure accurate retrieval and setting of materials and shadow reception states, thereby improving the overall test coverage and robustness of the MeshRenderer.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
tests/src/core/MeshRenderer.test.ts	Added test cases for receiveShadows, material management methods, materialCount, and priority property.

Poem

In a realm where shadows play,
Our MeshRenderer found its way.
With materials set and counted right,
It dances in the soft moonlight.
Hops of joy for tests so bright! 🐰✨

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 66.76%. Comparing base (f95455f) to head (4d422c6). Report is 2 commits behind head on dev/1.4.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           dev/1.4    #2345      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    67.09%   66.76%   -0.34%     
===========================================
  Files          895      895              
  Lines        92094    92094              
  Branches      7274     7305      +31     
===========================================
- Hits         61795    61488     -307     
- Misses       30054    30361     +307     
  Partials       245      245              

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	66.76% <ø> (-0.34%)	:arrow_down:

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.