Gábor Csárdi comments

Results 2061 comments of


                                            Gábor Csárdi

'self' triggers 'no visible binding for global variable'

In this case you can put `self

progress is not updating the progress bar on a single line

It seems like it is not possible. What does this print for you? ```r { cat("foo") cat("\rbar\n") } ```

`devtools::check()` creating warning that only contains `NULL`

Can you show us a package that reproduces this?

`devtools::check()` creating warning that only contains `NULL`

I am afraid this is an issue with base R: ``` ❯ _R_CHECK_CRAN_INCOMING_REMOTE_=FALSE _R_CHECK_CRAN_INCOMING_=FALSE R CMD check --as-cran reprexpkg [...] * checking foreign function calls ... OK * checking R...

`devtools::check()` creating warning that only contains `NULL`

> @gaborcsardi you mind explaining what the issue is a bit more? Not sure I follow. I wish I could, but I don't know what the issue is. > Are...

`devtools::check()` creating warning that only contains `NULL`

Sure, you can report it to the R bug tracker if you like.

`devtools::check()` creating warning that only contains `NULL`

I can reproduce this without any packages, so it is probably a bug in base R. Can you please link to your bug report?

`devtools::check()` creating warning that only contains `NULL`

Turns out this is (was) a bug in rig, fixed in the new 0.5.2 version. You can reinstall the R version(s) you have this issue with using rig 0.5.2 and...

`rcmdcheck::check()` fails on Windows when Rtools is not installed

As a workaround, you can build the source package first, and then call `rcmdcheck::rcmdcheck()` on that.

Escape non-method members with `I()`

So this would be up to the user that implements the R6 class, right? I am not sure how R6 would be able to tell the difference.