gab-dissenter-extension icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
gab-dissenter-extension copied to clipboard

Error: Download removed from Dissenter.com site

Open tcreek opened this issue 4 years ago • 12 comments

What;s going on with that?

I have ZERO interest on any browser based on Google's Chrome.

tcreek avatar Jan 15 '20 07:01 tcreek

Yeah. I don't care about a browser, give me the extension download link.

jakubgs avatar Jan 15 '20 18:01 jakubgs

I have both the chrome and the firefox extensions saved if you want them. I also complained about this browser being the only option. They should put the latest extensions available for download on the Dissenter site.

VidarrKerr avatar Jan 24 '20 15:01 VidarrKerr

They have them here already on GitHub. The point is they removed them off their site, have not done any more work on the extensions, and instead pushing that horrible Goolag based garbage Chromium. We do not need to be giving Goolag more control over the internet.

tcreek avatar Jan 24 '20 18:01 tcreek

Ah, I did not look here to find them because I have the latest ones before they stopped updating. Thanks for the info.

I think it was a HUGE MISTAKE to stop making the extensions. As a successful entrepreneur, I wish I could get someone at GAB to respond back to me about the development of their products. They are making many grave mistakes.

There are many courses of actions that could easily be taken to make Dissenter explode on the world scene. It almost seems like they don't want that to happen. Anyone else interested, feel free to contact me here or vidarrkerr at gmail.

VidarrKerr avatar Jan 24 '20 22:01 VidarrKerr

Prefer more control over browser. I use https://chromium.woolyss.com/ and https://github.com/NeverDecaf/chromium-web-store for plugins. This plugin definitely needs a come back!

jazzerciseme avatar Jan 31 '20 23:01 jazzerciseme

They have them here already on GitHub. The point is they removed them off their site, have not done any more work on the extensions, and instead pushing that horrible Goolag based garbage Chromium. We do not need to be giving Goolag more control over the internet.

fyi Dissenter browser is based on Brave not Google's chrome

ArtexJay avatar Jan 25 '21 21:01 ArtexJay

They have them here already on GitHub. The point is they removed them off their site, have not done any more work on the extensions, and instead pushing that horrible Goolag based garbage Chromium. We do not need to be giving Goolag more control over the internet.

fyi Dissenter browser is based on Brave not Google's chrome

Sorry to tell you, but Brave is forked Chromium.

tcreek avatar Jan 25 '21 21:01 tcreek

Is Chromium=Goolag? Isn't Chromium the defanged open source browser onto which Goolag tacks on all their malware?

Meaning, Chromium, Brave and Dissenter are fine, while Googlag's Chrome is not, no?

andrebu avatar Jan 27 '22 02:01 andrebu

Is Chromium=Goolag? Isn't Chromium the defanged open source browser onto which Goolag tacks on all their malware?

Meaning, Chromium, Brave and Dissenter are fine, while Googlag's Chrome is not, no?

That is correct. With Goolag gaining more control over the web (~93% market share?), people need to stop using Chromium based browsers.

tcreek avatar Jan 27 '22 04:01 tcreek

Don't mean to be obtuse, but want to clarify this:

  1. If Chromium is made by goolag, does that mean Chromium has goolag's spyware, ad-bloat and malware built in?
  2. Pretty much the same question but for Dissenter browser and Brave -- since they're built on Chromium, does that mean they have googlag's malware built in, or do they remove it before adding their features?

I was under the impression that they clean Chromium (if anything to clean) before adding their features and releasing.

andrebu avatar Jan 27 '22 17:01 andrebu

Chromium only has open source stuff in it. Not sure exactly what it contains, but Brave is a fork of Chromium with their own telemetry stuff in it. Dissenter is a fork of Brave.

No matter what you use above, even Chrome, they all get counted as Chromium when you hit web sites. Why would why developers make sure other browser are compatible with all browsers, and add-ons if well over 90% of people are Chromium based browsers?

tcreek avatar Jan 27 '22 21:01 tcreek

Just to make a point of example. I visited Fox News with the latest Firefox browser, and their commenting section no long functions with Firefox. A while back I used to at least get a warning with Waterfox Classic that the browser is no longer supported, and would not show the comments. Now the comment section will not even load with current Firefox.

tcreek avatar Jan 29 '22 05:01 tcreek