Propose utils package

[metal3d]

[Jacalz]

Are there any more wrappers that would make sense to be added? The most simple that I can think of is https://github.com/fyne-io/fyne/blob/v2.1.4/canvasobject.go#L96 (no requirement, just getting the idea out there). Focusable and draggable are likely the ones that would the most useful but they are a lot more complex.

[andydotxyz]

Doesn't Go tell us to avoid generic utils package? Great ideas here but not sure about this naming as it doesn't convey what the types internally will do / be.

[metal3d]

@Jacalz maybe drag and drop yes. I can try to add this. Focusable is maybe a bit weird on, e.g., images…

@andydotxyz Yes, “utils” is a bad idea, maybe “addons” or “adapters”, or... “extends”... Any idea ?

[Jacalz]

How about “wrappers”?

[Bluebugs]

Maybe also a simple wrapper that provide a CreateRenderer for a specified object (both of the wrapper in this PR duplicate this code and the PR with layout would also benefit from it).

[Bluebugs]

Also a feature to add to the Tappable wrapper, maybe having the ability to do the same animation/effect automatically as when a button get tapped would make sense (I might make that something you can enable/disable).

[andydotxyz]

Maybe also a simple wrapper that provide a CreateRenderer for a specified object (both of the wrapper in this PR duplicate this code and the PR with layout would also benefit from it).

Isn't this what the core widget.SimpleRenderer does?

[Jacalz]

@metal3d Do you have any plans on getting this done soon? It would be a great addition to fyne-x :)

[andydotxyz]

I'm still not sure about the Set... naming, earlier @lucor suggested Make... instead - what do @Jacalz and @Bluebugs think (having already approved).

[Bluebugs]

Using Make instead of Set sounds good to me too. I would approve such a change.

[metal3d]

Changed to MakeXXX and fixed the comment import to "wrapper".