Federico Valeri
Federico Valeri
> I see just moving a header to a dedicated class and nothing more in the direction of "extract a cruise control client" as the PR name suggests. Here the...
@scholzj @ppatierno thanks for the review. This started as a simple refactoring, but I now agree on the necessity of a formal proposal before moving on with sharing the CC...
@tombentley are you ok with the current state? I would need this to complete some other TO changes. Keep in mind that I'll create a new proposal for sharing the...
@tombentley should be complete now, thanks for your suggestions.
That's correct @scholzj. > we might just not want Strimzi to manage them or expose them as k8s resources. Using the new [UnidirectionalTopicOperator](https://strimzi.io/docs/operators/latest/deploying#ref-operator-unidirectional-topic-operator-feature-gate-str) (UTO), which is fully backward compatible, you...
The original reproducer for this issue is now obsolete due to the new Topic Operator unidirectional reconciliation. None of the 3 issues mentioned there happens today. That said, the point...
This would be a really useful feature. Does it trigger a rolling update? In that case, it couldn't be used with hard to reproduce issues.
@khartld hi, what's the state of this fix? No rush, but let me know if you need any help.
Fixed via #10412.
> So as we have in the UserOperator capacity perf test, that wants to answer the question: Ok this makes sense, thanks. > This is an interesting one and I...