Frank Sachsenheim

okay, i started working on a draft and then i couldn't stop. :dancers: so let's call this an implemented draft. any feedback is appreciated. especially from the controller's perspective, whether...

There's actually more progress on my computer. Unfortunately with a flaw. I don't think it would be a big deal and am suspecting a simple change that is necessary. Haven't...

with the latest commit it's ready to be reviewed. there are still missing features (those marked with `pass # TODO` i'm aware of) and missing docstrings.

@mNantern I'm uncertain atm how to proceed with the filters. Actually my approach was to implement `Task.tasks_filtered_by` in a way that it mainly works with sets and its operators (eg....

i think i got it. but i'm irritated what's the use of the `filter`-property of a `FilterTreeWidgetItem`-instance (in `filters_tree_view.py`). is it planned to use it in future? (at least i...

well, `.isMatch` was solely used by `Task.filterTasks`. but i remodeled that: `Task.tasks_filtered_by` uses `filter.matches` which make as much use of indexes and set operations as possible. anyhow, `isMatch` is still...

ah, one thing i actually would like to rework here too, would be the filters. atm, they are not very atomic, some filter on two task-properties. but that's not necessary...

that would break the `--quickadd` cli option if i'm not wrong.

this proposal is actually excluded by #113. sorry, but word-wrapped tasks are not specified in the todo.txt-standard and it wouldn't fit its conception. @AnderRasoVazquez you are referring to a word-wrap...

another neat view option is to group tasks by project or tag. i have some ideas for changes to the Task-API in mind that should be helpful for that.