Paul Masurel
Paul Masurel
I agree with the change. Can you check that it does not provoke a regression however?
We need to be careful with backward compatiblity with that one. Is it motivated by a problem observed on quickwit side? Is there a ticket open somewhere?
The query parser expects you date in the format rfc3339. In this format, the space is replaced by a T `timestamp:[2024-03-04T16:45:00 TO 2024-03-04T16:46:03]`
I suggest we just remove the ability to sort the index by something. It has brought more bugs, confusion than any other feature.
I don't understand your sentence.
I'm mostly interested to hear about testing tips. `loom` and `fail-rs` is something that is in my radar for instance. I would also love to see a convergence on best...
Is there a release planned @faern ?
@LebranceBW don't forget to reapply for review once you have added the requested changes
@PSeitz can you help @LebranceBW and take over the code review?
The two document indeed contains the following: ``` {"o_params": {"\u0000\">alert(309)": "1"}} {"o_params": {" ADw-script AD4-alert(312) ADw-/script AD4-": "1"}} ```