Eitaro Fukamachi

I fixed the above benchmark result a little bit. I'm still trying that, but probably e7df0e44944d0c98a555509ccb6fab4d9f653b76 is better than the latest uv branch.

I benchmarked again with the latest cl-async and fast-io. Here's the report: | | Before | After | | --- | --: | --: | | Requests/sec | 12293.87 |...

Here's the latest profiling report: ``` seconds | gc | consed | calls | sec/call | name ------------------------------------------------------------- 1.909 | 0.047 | 436,468,864 | 99,788 | 0.000019 | WOO.RESPONSE:RESPONSE-HEADERS-BYTES 0.793...

FYI, official SBCL binary for Mac is a little bit old and has no thread support. http://sbcl.org/platform-table.html

You're right. `flags=--fancy` worked well. Although, I gave a glance at #12. I think the thread is very important feature enough to enable by default. Is there any way to...

I meant the change in #12. IMO, CIM should install SBCL with threads by default because just no-threads implementation could be confusable. On no thread SBCL, you cannot use some...

Is it okay to be same as `C-x b`?

I’d like to fix the requirements which you need. Check out C-x b on lem and it’s still what you expect since lem provides the feature in a different way...

Thank you for reporting. I'm happy that Woo has come to be used enough to get asked about this kind of internal problem. Woo takes a round-robin approach assigning jobs...

Nothing yet. Actually, I've been waiting for someone to point out that it has become a real problem.