Standardize on a single marker name: "order"

[fmoor]

Reading the documentation I noticed that there are a lot of potential marker names including run(), and even custom markers proposed in #10. It seems like this has the potential to result in confusing code. Say for instance that some one is new to a project and doesn't know about pytest-ordering. What does the run marker do? Run is a very ambiguous word. I would like to suggest choosing a more specific name. As an option order might be a more intuitive name for someone reading code. The marker signature might look like this: order(pos=None, before=None, after=None).

[ftobia]

Calling the marker order sounds like a good idea.

[ftobia]

I've updated the title to describe the proposal. I think a single marker name that takes parameters is a good idea -- though I'm interested to hear feedback from folks if you agree or disagree.

[mrbean-bremen]

I like this, and I implemented this in my fork, removing all other special markers.