Federico Stagni
Federico Stagni
Indeed I misread Jun != Jan, sorry about that.
CC @phicharp as he made lots of work in this part I first started writing specific comments but I realize we first need some long awaited definitions, that I would...
And regarding the actually proposed solutions: I agree with everything you are proposing. On your last point: > ### Decrease CPUTimeLeft compared to the reality before requesting a job? >...
What BDII defines is quite terrible, and I would suggest that at least those parameters are renamed to the correct terminology (if we agree on the terminology itself, first of...
We can't estimate the **CPUWork** that already running jobs on PoolCEs will consume, but we can use the value that their JDLs store (in `CPUTime` -> `CPUWork`) and simply subtract...
> If I understand correctly your comment, the current definition of (C)PUTimeLeft in the code would be (C)PUWorkLeft as it is actually in HS06s. Yes. We have not been very...
Thanks for your comments Philippe. A couple notes: > IMHO, we should first take the definitions Federico recalled and fix all variable names in the code, including JDL parameters, keeping...
Good summary Alexandre. **Time:** > Do the plugins return an incorrect time left result because of the specific features of the batch systems? Because of the output that is not...
The possible historical reasons behind the current way of working of the watchdog are too historical even for me! And I have never reviewed the module myself in these last...
Is there still something to be done for this one?