Florian Schwennsen

As I said on stand-up I also started to write something (offline). Most of it already is covered by Sam's description - tanks a lot! A few additions: - arxivIDs...

> > One could think of refextract moving a 999C5s of an erratum to the marc field of the original article which would be nice for the display - otherwise...

This seems to happen even for pending articles. https://labs.inspirehep.net/holdingpen/677472 was harvested while https://labs.inspirehep.net/holdingpen/676633 was already waiting for a decision. It has not been updated on arXiv (https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.02998) meanwhile.

Stupid question: APS is ticked - does it mean it is considered 'completed'? I somehow can not see how it handles references?

WSP, Springer, Elsevier, IOP, SPIE, AIP, SISSA, jacow, JPS, IEEE, EDP, CUP, Jagelonian

Right, it would be easier if we could pass on collections of records in a file.

If needed, we can split the xml also on DESY side - no problem.

The publishers where we get fulltexts will run via HEPCrawl. For all these smaller publishers for which we need the DESYmarcxmlSpider the only fulltexts are OA for which the xml...

Dear Thorsten, I think I can add test routines following Melissas example. Thanks for pointing them out to me. But I will probably fail with the rebase stuff. Would it...

Obviously you know the system better than me. Does every record 'pass' literature.py? Also user suggestions and new records by BibEdit?