Fabian Ruffy
Fabian Ruffy
Thank you! > Hmm, I don't quite understand the issue: if you don't need the definitions in gc_cpp.cc then why do you link with libgccpp.a (or .so)? We also need...
> > We also need libgccpp.a because of GC_throw_bad_alloc > > Use libgctba.a instead Must have missed this one, let me try.
> @fruffy How much of the boost used is not header-only? If it would be just headers, we may just extract a piece of it and vendor. `iostreams` and `graphs`...
> Do we need a concrete version of boost that is newer then what is available on supported OSes? If not, I don't see a big reason to fetch boost...
> Please don't force downstreams that use boost libraries not used by P4C to get boost themselves, downstreams need to have a way of adding to the libraries that will...
> Also, how much longer does the initial build take with boost built by ourselves? What takes a bit is downloading boost, the actual compilation is the same because boost...
>I think I already mentioned that it is possible to extract header-only part of boost and vendor it. Then there will be no need to fetch the things. I looked...
> There is an official boost tool `bcp` to make such subset. And I do already have this subset just in case :) We could add those instead! I have...
> There is an official boost tool `bcp` to make such subset. And I do already have this subset just in case :) So after discussing this offline it looks...