Frost Ming
Frost Ming
see the context in #2854 you may need to discuss with @Pluttodk on how to solve this cleany and make both happy
pdm supports a series of options to select and unselect groups and you can get whatever groups you need. https://pdm-project.org/latest/usage/dependency/#select-a-subset-of-dependency-groups-to-install
Look at the `pdm-autoexport` plugin, and this action allows installing plugins
On my machine the resolution succeeds in 30s, with `pydantic==1.10.7` pinned.
> I thought maybe that is why you all got different results. Alas, no No, I even used `--exclude-newer=2024-07-15` to return to the old days but it also succeeds. There...
Since this is a year old issue, does it reproduce on the latest bentoml?
Can you show the output of the following command: ``` /usr/bin/python3.12 /path/to/pdm/lib/site-packages/pdm/models/in_process/sysconfig_get_paths.py prefix ```
That does not make sense, since we are using the `purelib` path: https://github.com/frostming/pdm-packer/blob/3ec0828a8f18711028bf73702b029de62295914d/src/pdm_packer/env.py#L74 Can you provide the full traceback by adding `-v`
@cvgaviao what is the version of PDM? can you use the latest version of PDM?
@wimglenn Thank you, I just noticed this PR. In fact, #834 is still eager, but it allows exceptions to exist and considers them during evaluation. The implementation also doesn't look...