package "batctl-default" and "batctl-tiny" are included in regular
Bug report
In the recent builds the images (for >4MB flash) include 2 variants of the batctl-package in parallel
When both packages are installed it's not well defined, which variant is used by calling /usr/sbin/batctl. This probably started when upstream introduced these variants in https://github.com/openwrt-routing/packages/commit/129986825219d6d276098da8fe419e206bb9a056 some time ago.
This I saw by having a look into the .manifest file of the images.
What is the expected behaviour? Only one variant of the package should be installed.
Firmware Version: at least recent master-code (5725069daae00b3cc301d70b1be4d9deebb5e8d2)
a simple exclusion from the package-list, via -batctl-tiny did not do (d321c9f77e7f234d5ba2a712ea147f9c1ba59868).
I assume the tiny-variant is pulled by some dependency.