Frédéric Wang
Frédéric Wang
Yes, and Mozilla's bug is https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1631446
> Re: (1) "the only reference is on the IDL" - this is good, isn't it? The IDL bindings take care of limiting use, we shouldn't add redundant prose? Right,...
I opened https://github.com/WICG/cookie-store/pull/194 for secure context / unsecure context.
Also cc'ing @khaledhosny and @behdad as they have worked on the implementation in fontforge/fonttools.
Thanks Anne. I opened this for the record and I have not really investigated into this to be honest, but checking the chromium tests, I see 3 things: - something...
OK, thanks. For the record, why the success is not web-exposed is explained in https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/5845
> It should, see [w3c/webref#681](https://github.com/w3c/webref/issues/681) for how to fix it (I was waiting for an answer from @fred-wang to know if he wanted to do it or not) I see...
Yes, the TeX parsing is trivial. Here is an example from Wikipedia where a hack is used: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gauss%27s_law#Integral_form_2 If you enable MathJax, you see an ugly image of the contour...
I guess in the Latin Modern fonts.
> The annotation-xml will work if you provide the namespace Ah, I thought I had tried that but apparently didn't. That's what I meant by "XHTML vs HTML", that is...