franzap

@staab @fiatjaf @vitorpamplona This one is good to merge. I'm happy to create a PR on NIP-39 if I get a confirmation that it will actually get merged.

> It seems like this does the same thing as NIP 39? I like the dedicated event as an addition, but I would add it as an addition to NIP...

@caesar Yes this will be added to NIP-39. I don't mind updating the spec to what you suggest.

Closing in favor of https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/1335

Just read the NIP again. A few questions: > The special value `*` represents general trust in the person. How about, just like `score`, leaving it undefined (meaning not sure)...

> > This is a PRE so why not simple remove it instead of marking it as revoked? > > Are you referring to NIP-9 for event deletion? I know...

> To me, the heart and soul of this NIP is simply that we should have 3 fields: context, score, and confidence. I'm OK with being open to the idea...

For some reason it started working better lately (not 100% yet). I'll try disabling trackers next time it doesn't work, and paste here errors in the console. Should happen to...