Francesco Nigro

@santhoshTpixler Thanks, I'm trying with the last version this same fix: but is a required step? I mean, on the doc I haven't found it to be necessary to get...

Hi @kuujo , sorry to bother about this, but we would like to use Atomix as one of the RI for the https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis distributed lock implementation, but we're hitting this...

@johnou thanks to look into this, sadly the test I've provided won't have any failure to deal with, because what just an example to show how to produce the leak......

AFAIK nope, I've just called a stop when the node hasn't yet joined the rest of the cluster (because the other nodes are not reachable, for example, or not yet...

Just looked around in the doc and haven't found anything different from `Atomic::stop` for my needs, let me know if there are other methods I've missed.... I see instead, in...

@johnou let me know if I need to share/do anything to help more on this

Wdyt @nitsanw ? Do you think is a valid/interesting use case?

I like the "sneaky*" name, nice one! > I see a conflict here between ‘take’ and ‘wakeup’ that can be confusing. You mean re the words meaning?

Ah, you're right,I gotta refresh how the unblock thing work but I was thinking more about a wakeup-if-not-empty semantic (not sure is feasible) Il sab 8 mag 2021, 16:04 Nitsan...

Looking at the stack-trace: - `NonBlockingHashMap::putIfMatch` could throw NPE only if `oldVal` or `newVal` are `null` at that line of code - for `NonBlockingHashMap::remove` `newVal` is `TOMBSTONE` ie `oldVal` is...