Frank Grießhammer

The document you linked states _“glyph may also have appearance of large form of the small letter”_. This example demonstrates that “following Unicode” often is ambiguous – therefore, (IMO) other...

Thanks for your thoughts, @andjc! I agree that `locl` tagging is a spotty way of implementing character alternates, and this concern has come up before (with Bulgarian alternates, for example)....

Thanks for this detailed report. I will consider the addition of this glyph in a future release. FWIW, in my own research, I found small-cap height ℟ and ℣ characters...

Thank you. So this would basically be an alternate of U+1EC9? I was about to suggest implementing your suggestion as a default form for the i + combining hook sequence,...

Same here (as in #21) – please provide background info, and let me know how you plan to help.

@brawer @pauldhunt I find this: https://github.com/googlei18n/noto-source/commit/b85e6f0fb52d4e411cd2e76fa2af4c09eb26416a

@nozoka That sounds great, thank you! Currently, Source Serif itself does not support many IPA characters, but IPA support is definitely something to think about. I’d be curious to see...

Thank you @nozoka! I can definitely use those glyphs in a future IPA update of Source Serif. The drafting quality in your files is very high, I am impressed! (...

What’s obvious to one user might not be so obvious to the other :-) I am thinking of AL5 as one goal to achieve; and a logical progression from the...

Thanks for this observation! I don’t have the same setup so I can’t reproduce this exactly, but my thinking is that his may have to do with LibreOffice’s PDF export...