Frank Pepermans

@brianegan I do like `onDoneResume` as a name better than `concatWith`, if we do keep `concatWith`, maybe we oughta drop passing a `List` in favour of a `Stream`. (But `concatWith`...

I would prefer it to take just a single Stream indeed, same with zipWith and mergeWith. We aren't 1.0 yet, so I feel we still can.

I'd just use startWith and then pairWise, then you get a pair on the first event already.

_Some_ tests have been skipped, they all use Timers and were flaky by design. I'm gonna look for a better way to test them.

There's a difference indeed between combineLatest and withLatestForm, easiest to explain is via marbles: - https://rxmarbles.com/#combineLatest - https://rxmarbles.com/#withLatestFrom ...but it's a bit more work than the example extension ``` extension...

I'm a bit reluctant to just include it also as an operator, I think using `Rx.combineLatest` is actually clearer: all streams are treated equal, the api is easy to understand,...

It might be hard to implement, since rxdart builds upon plain Dart streams, however, if both BehaviorSubjects are sync=true, then it might be doable, Did you test the example with...

We have BehaviorSubject.seeded, or do you mean renaming that one to StateSubject, or is different?

Value is a tricky one, it gets set after the event effectively emits, it should print 2 if the subject were a sync subject, otherwise, there's a small microdelay taking...

It should yes :) But map is from dart sdk streams, it returns a MapStream, so not sure but it might not be sync, if it is sync then we...