franki29

Hi @joel-bourquard , thanks, yes I had a great Christmas days. Regarding your captures, I am not sure if you really used the right parameters. Looking with audacity at the...

HI, did you read the issue in #2189 ? There was a broken unit, did you test only one or all.? Br .Frank

OK, can you generate a cu8 file please so we can take a look into.?

That is very strange, parity check is failing and if you disable the parity check, the event codes that are send from the device is different from the working example....

Hi @zuckschwerdt , not sure but you mean to use -f 433.89M during recording?

Hi @Ninja1283 and @bombledmonk, did you test the Sensors with the option -f 433.89M like Christian was suggesting?

Hmm, very strange. The parity is still not working and the codes seems to be different. See [bitbench](https://triq.net/bitbench#c=%5BNot%20working%5D&c=de0dcfab22c3&c=de0dcfab22c3&c=de0dcdfe4ef1&c=de0dcdfe4ef1&c=&c=%5BWorking%5D&c=babe05050758&c=babe04040758&f=%5BID%3A%5D%20~8h8h%20%5BEvent%3A%5D%20~8h%20%5BUnknown%5D%20~8h%20~8h%20~8h&cw=4) For those devices the codes seems to be: (event == 0x054) {...

@zuckschwerdt Hmm, I saw a thread in homeassistant where a user is also claiming that some sensors does not work. So maybe they really change the protocol. I also pick...

Hi @zuckschwerdt , I was playing around with the bitbench data. Can this be a solution for the "new Version"? (But I think I am terrible wrong :-) ) [Bitbench](https://triq.net/bitbench#c=%5BNot%20working%5D&c=de0dcfab22c3&c=de0dcfab22c3&c=de0dcdfe4ef1&c=de0dcdfe4ef1&c=&c=%5BWorking%5D&c=babe05050758&c=babe04040758&f=ID%3A8h8h%20%3F4h%20EVENT%3A4h%20EVENTDATA%3A8h%20%3F8h%20%3F4h%20CHK%3A4h&i=true&cf=XOR&cl=32&cw=4)

Same at my side, with Beta it seems to work . I am using esp32dev-rtl_433.