incomplete *Lazy coverage

[chris-findlay]

While you have covered all variants of {,}, including * and +, the lazy alternatives are missing for exactly and atLeast.

[francisrstokes]

Hey Chris - indeed, atLeast should have a lazy equivalent. For exactly I don't think it would make sense, since the regex can't match more anyway (though there could be a exactlyLazy that just dispatches to exactly, this might cause more confusion than it's worth).

[chris-findlay]

True - I guess it is a bit of a trap for when writing REs that a{4} === a{4}? !== (?:a{4})?.