Samuel Tyler
Samuel Tyler
I think that with #292 the goals at least for 1.0 are very clear.
Oh, duh, obviously this wont just work in a PR. Hmmm
can repro on debian
I can confirm this issue when using busybox's `df`. It appears that the functionality of busybox's `df` is not equivalent in some way to coreutils `df`.
Hmm, ok that is a compelling point. I agree at least for that case. Let's drop on-disk sysa for 1.0.
If OpenSSL 3 is easy sure. I suspect that it might not be simple, but we can give it a try. 100% for nss.
I have (tentatively) created a 1.0 branch. Happy for almost anything to be merged into there at the moment, except for any large architectural changes.
This may be a fairly good solution for #306 for 1.0, actually. Let me know if you hit any blockers with this.
Yeah, the `rootfs.py` infra doesn't really respond properly to pre-bootstrap failures right now.
This is a kind of "not-a-bug but bad behaviour" kind of thing. This is fully expected behaviour right now! Just to clarify what is going on here; 1. The new...