Colin Woodbury
Colin Woodbury
I'm sure there are many who are eagerly awaiting this, thank you.
Thanks for reporting, I will look into this.
Thanks for this, I will review soon.
Thanks for this and please forgive the delay.
The first thing to try is to see what effect this feature flag has: https://github.com/archlinux/alpm.rs/blob/master/alpm/Cargo.toml#L25 If libalpm itself can be vendored, then that should be enough.
As mentioned in the linked issue, the problem is with the `track-changes` library, which is doing naughty things upstream w.r.t. `incf` vs `cl-incf`. For anyone who wanders in here, apply...
Thank you! Upstream also recently solved a similar issues involving `incf` in another place, but they may not know it's broken in `track-changes` too. I will confirm that soon.
This seems to have been finally fixed upstream.
Thanks for this, I'll review as soon as I'm able. Note that there will likely be some merge conflicts once #30 goes in.
Thanks for the suggestion, I'll look into it.