fortls
fortls copied to clipboard
mention eglot for emacs support
eglot is a popular lsp client for emacs that supports fortls.
Codecov Report
Merging #129 (447c6af) into master (34f5bbf) will not change coverage. The diff coverage is
n/a
.
:exclamation: Current head 447c6af differs from pull request most recent head 6053c22. Consider uploading reports for the commit 6053c22 to get more accurate results
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #129 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 86.00% 86.00%
=======================================
Files 11 11
Lines 4430 4430
=======================================
Hits 3810 3810
Misses 620 620
:mega: We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more
Ok, I will update the pull request tonight.
Regarding the wrong link please see https://github.com/joaotavora/eglot/pull/965, hopefully this will be updated soon.
Last but not least: if in f90 mode, eglot will start fortls as default, so no copy and paste required :-)
Ok, I updated the pull request.
Unfortunately, nothing has happend regarding https://github.com/joaotavora/eglot/pull/965 yet.
Any news on this @ssnnoo ?
Any news on this @ssnnoo ?
Hi, I changed the commit as requested a while ago and it should be fine now (hopefully). One thing that did not happen is that https://github.com/joaotavora/eglot/pull/965 got merged. But this is completely independent of this contribution here :-)
Any news on this @ssnnoo ?
Hi, I changed the commit as requested a while ago and it should be fine now (hopefully). One thing that did not happen is that joaotavora/eglot#965 got merged. But this is completely independent of this contribution here :-)
The problem is that the underlying extension is pointing to the wrong server, which leads to confusion from the user's perspective. I will go drop a comment
Any news on this @ssnnoo ?
Hi, I changed the commit as requested a while ago and it should be fine now (hopefully). One thing that did not happen is that joaotavora/eglot#965 got merged. But this is completely independent of this contribution here :-)
The problem is that the underlying extension is pointing to the wrong server, which leads to confusion from the user's perspective. I will go drop a comment
Sure, I agree. But this is only in the readme, in the source code it only refers to fortls.
((fortran-mode f90-mode) . ("fortls"))
and this should be fine. There is not automatic installation or anything.