former
former copied to clipboard
[L4] Empty string input value treated as null / not set
I'm having some trouble using the Former plugin for Laravel, to handle forms & fields.
The use-case is an "edit"-form for a given model.
Former::text('title')
->label('Title')
->value( $title );
Former::text('description')
->label('Description')
->value( $description );
Rules:
- The title must always exist and be at least 10 chars long.
- The description may be empty.
Expected behaviour:
When loading the edit form, I expect the form to show the values of $title and $description in the fields.
Whenever submitting a the form with invalid field-values, I expect the submitted values to be shown in the fields, instead of the values of $title and $description.
Problem:
This works only when submitting non-empty strings!
When submitting an empty-string, it's like Former handles it like the field-hasn't even been submitted, and therefore uses the value given by $title or $description instead.
I thought Former was able to do this "smart", and take the value($variable) value only if the posted data does not contain the field. But it seems Former is taking the variables value also when the submitted was empty.
Why is this a problem?
Imagine you edit both fields, and actually want to change the title and remove the description entirely, which is valid according to the rules. Then, because you entered a too short title, the validation does not pass, and title will get the new (too short) title as field-value, while the description value will fall back to the value of the $description variable, instead of showing an empty field, which was posted.
It feels like $_POST['description'] = "" is treated like $_POST['description'] = null or is not set - even though the empty field is part of the post.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/24575011/laravel-former-input-field-posted-with-empty-value-shows-old-original-value-in
I've run into this myself and thought it was odd. I agree that a POST'd value, even if empty, should override ->value()
.
Unfortunately, I would consider this to be a fairly large breaking change -- let's target this for 5.0.0