New username: @17o2

Results 183 comments of New username: @17o2

Personally, while I'm not opposed to the idea of tweaking the look of the output, to help with clarity, I'm not a big fan of the ideas proposed so far....

> > Conceptionally you can imagine it as looking down bundle and seeing all the indiviual wires in relief. > > I'm not quite sure what is meant by this....

Current state: ![bomnumbertest](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2447251/112141493-a2c44a00-8bd5-11eb-8f64-b448ce07c1b8.png) Source ```yaml connectors: X1: type: Plug pincount: 4 pn: 123 manufacturer: ACME mpn: ABC additional_components: - type: Crimp pn: 987 manufacturer: ACME mpn: ZYX qty_multiplier: populated -...

@kvid @Tyler-Ward I am open for suggestions as to how to extract the assigned BOM ID for cables and connectors (after deduplication etc.) and inserting it into the new `bom_item_number`...

Using `additional_parameters` to add user-defined parameters to connectors and cables, as proposed in [#222](https://github.com/formatc1702/WireViz/issues/222#issuecomment-803313632): ![bomnumbertest](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2447251/112167380-b16c2a80-8bf0-11eb-9bc9-ade00dbab934.png) Source ```yaml connectors: X1: type: KK 254 subtype: plug pincount: 4 pinlabels: [QWE,RTY,UIO,P__] pn: 123...

There is primitive functionality to attach two pins of the same connector. Please see the end of this modified example: ```yaml connectors: X1: type: D-Sub subtype: female pinout: [DCD, RX,...

Yes, I do agree the current implementation is ugly and missing information... any ideas and/or pull requests on this topic are welcome!

Here's a mockup of what it could look like: ![IMG_3700](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2447251/87183014-91f0d400-c2e5-11ea-9e12-939116eceefa.JPG) I'm not sure how easy that would be to represent graphically... I'll think about it. A possible input syntax could...

Sorry for the super late reply! In the newly released v0.2, try the following to short pins 3 and 10... it will be displayed as a wire loop between them,...

Yes, I think loops and internal shorts is something we should tackle soon, since a lot of users request this and complain about the current implementation... which is understandable :)