New username: @17o2
New username: @17o2
Personally, while I'm not opposed to the idea of tweaking the look of the output, to help with clarity, I'm not a big fan of the ideas proposed so far....
> > Conceptionally you can imagine it as looking down bundle and seeing all the indiviual wires in relief. > > I'm not quite sure what is meant by this....
Current state: data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/365ae/365ae19a01d96ac850d5eb4301a1e28c01210d78" alt="bomnumbertest" Source ```yaml connectors: X1: type: Plug pincount: 4 pn: 123 manufacturer: ACME mpn: ABC additional_components: - type: Crimp pn: 987 manufacturer: ACME mpn: ZYX qty_multiplier: populated -...
@kvid @Tyler-Ward I am open for suggestions as to how to extract the assigned BOM ID for cables and connectors (after deduplication etc.) and inserting it into the new `bom_item_number`...
Using `additional_parameters` to add user-defined parameters to connectors and cables, as proposed in [#222](https://github.com/formatc1702/WireViz/issues/222#issuecomment-803313632): data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2060e/2060e8c01196585668b484ab58d28f1bade2e23a" alt="bomnumbertest" Source ```yaml connectors: X1: type: KK 254 subtype: plug pincount: 4 pinlabels: [QWE,RTY,UIO,P__] pn: 123...
There is primitive functionality to attach two pins of the same connector. Please see the end of this modified example: ```yaml connectors: X1: type: D-Sub subtype: female pinout: [DCD, RX,...
Yes, I do agree the current implementation is ugly and missing information... any ideas and/or pull requests on this topic are welcome!
Here's a mockup of what it could look like: data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b1e1/6b1e1ab84f963162903ff7f774bdd9be4ecd4636" alt="IMG_3700" I'm not sure how easy that would be to represent graphically... I'll think about it. A possible input syntax could...
Sorry for the super late reply! In the newly released v0.2, try the following to short pins 3 and 10... it will be displayed as a wire loop between them,...
Yes, I think loops and internal shorts is something we should tackle soon, since a lot of users request this and complain about the current implementation... which is understandable :)