DCFNet_pytorch icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
DCFNet_pytorch copied to clipboard

Is the AUC scored 0.665 obtained using this set of parameters?

Open LCAR979 opened this issue 6 years ago • 6 comments

By keeping your default parameters, without fine-tune, I got 0.6466 on OTB2013 and 0.6206 on OTB2015 (guess you are using py2 so I also tested using py2). So is that 0.665 score obtained by matlab version?

LCAR979 avatar Sep 28 '18 02:09 LCAR979

By keeping your default parameters, without fine-tune, I got 0.6466 on OTB2013 and 0.6206 on OTB2015 (guess you are using py2 so I also tested using py2). So is that 0.665 score obtained by matlab version?

why I just got 0.6248 success rate on OTB2013 and 0.6037 on OTB2015? Have you changed the python version? How's it going?

shallowtoil avatar Oct 24 '18 13:10 shallowtoil

@jensenzhoujh, I got that result using py2. And I also tested if changed to py3, a few compatible problems will occur

LCAR979 avatar Oct 28 '18 09:10 LCAR979

@LCAR979 I changed to python 2.7 but got 0.6336/0.6014. Could you offer more details about the package versions?

shallowtoil avatar Nov 08 '18 10:11 shallowtoil

By keeping your default parameters, without fine-tune, I got 0.6466 on OTB2013 and 0.6206 on OTB2015 (guess you are using py2 so I also tested using py2). So is that 0.665 score obtained by matlab version?

why I just got 0.6248 success rate on OTB2013 and 0.6037 on OTB2015? Have you changed the python version? How's it going?

why do the results change when the python version changes?

ucasqcz avatar Nov 22 '18 06:11 ucasqcz

@jensenzhoujh I tested using python2.7.15 with pytorch0.4.1, under commit #17007f . @ucasqcz Division behaves differently in py2 and py3 and I think the author codes towards py2 ( there exists some compatibility problems)

LCAR979 avatar Nov 26 '18 13:11 LCAR979

I also got the 0.6466 success rate on OTB2013 too with python2.7

SY-Xuan avatar Jan 08 '19 01:01 SY-Xuan