Philip Jägenstedt
Philip Jägenstedt
"Otherwise, return undefined" is used in two places: https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-extensions/#dom-rtcrtpcontributingsource-capturetimestamp https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-extensions/#dom-rtcrtpcontributingsource-sendercapturetimeoffset If one takes this literally, one would create an own property with the value undefined. However, the intended behavior is...
It has the same support data as api.CustomElementRegistry.builtin_element_support.
It can only be used on SVG ``, ``, and ``, and previously `` which has been removed now.
These are changes that the collector can make after this bugfix: https://github.com/openwebdocs/mdn-bcd-collector/pull/1473
TODO: figure out if it's exposed but just doesn't do anything: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/7leKysvPZWk/m/-0fKweJ5AQAJ This now matches the other features tagged with web-features:compute-pressure.
### What type of issue is this? Incorrect support data (example: BrowserX says "86" but support was added in "40") ### What information was incorrect, unhelpful, or incomplete? https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/EXT_frag_depth#browser_compatibility https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/EXT_shader_texture_lod#browser_compatibility...
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1791759 enabled content-visibility:auto in Firefox, 125 as I understand it. This needs updating here: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/content-visibility#browser_compatibility
Only Safari isn't marked as partial implementation here: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/@counter-style/symbols#browser_compatibility Often when almost all browsers have a similar note, it actually applies to all browsers because it's some "future" spec concept...
In https://github.com/web-platform-dx/web-features/pull/977#pullrequestreview-2028097234 @ddbeck said: > Honestly, I do not love the change in https://github.com/mdn/browser-compat-data/pull/22951. It seems to me that spec'd prefixes ought to be their own keys in BCD (i.e.,...
Partial implementation and notes is used for a bunch of the `relative_syntax` entries, from https://github.com/mdn/browser-compat-data/pull/21937. I've sent https://github.com/mdn/browser-compat-data/pull/22960 for two notes I suspect are wrong. These are the remaining notes...