>>=
>>=
Is this to allow you to do multiple things at once? I've never had reason for a second one.
try this alternative: rename the long running sbt buffer to something else. Then start a new one. Then when the long running task is finished, throw it away.
me, when people ask how easy it would be to retrospectively add significant whitespace to an Emacs major mode:  I've written a major mode from scratch with a significant...
> I think Scala 3 is backward compatible enough that if we targeted it, it should basically cover Scala 2 as well I don't want you to be under any...
I'm not sure it belongs in the sbt mode because this compilation mode should be build tool agnostic (I just chose sbt as the default). e.g. a user could swap...
Sounds reasonable, you'll more than likely have to submit a PR for that. It would be good to support whatever scalafmt and scalariform do also.
Would you be interested in looking into it? It's the only way it'll get fixed because it's not bothering me or Heikki.
We have a contributors page is the Emacs section of ensime.org to get you started with some material.
Writing long expressions like this in strings seems like a terrible idea to me and I'm surprised the compiler tolerates it. I'm not sure I'm particularly keen on complicating the...
(I also hope everybody is using parboiled2 or fastparse for their scala parsing needs instead of rolling their own!)