folofjc

> Here's the output of my new code from your example. Can you see if it looks correct? > >  Yep, that looks like what I would expect.

> As for your second question, in my new code I seem to have assumed a consistent approach for books: > > ``` > \documentclass[letterpaper,12pt]{article} > \usepackage[style=sbl]{biblatex} > > \begin{filecontents}[overwrite]{\jobname.bib}...

> I wonder if Dahood shouldn't be repeated in the second citation? I think it should, because for edited volumes the editor is repeated when citing more essays from the...

> Perhaps I should make `citepages=omit` the default. > > Although this would break existing documents that don't expect this behaviour. I would agree that this should be the default....

Thanks! I'll try to give it a test. Do you have any suggestions on how to have both this and the old one in the same TeX installation? I don't...

> Thanks! I'll try to give it a test. Do you have any suggestions on how to have both this and the old one in the same TeX installation? I...

Great, thanks! So in your `sbl-example` file, did you include this source map? Because your example file looks like this result, and not like the student supplement (which means it...

Ah, you're right. I was looking at the second line, thinking that was also a footnote, but it was a short bib. Sorry! Yeah, I think the example file is...

Okay, so it was because I was usingboth `crossref` and `related`, right? I am still confused as to when to use what. Based upon the `biblatex` handbook, `crossref` and `xref`...

Ah, you are right, I just saw that in the `biblatex` document. I had missed the inheritance part.