folofjc

Huh, interesting. But when I comment out the shorthand, I was not getting the error. Do you know why? Yeah, I saw the `shortitle` and `shorthand` yesterday, and so I...

> The buggy code only runs in the case of entries with a `shorthand`. > > It's _only_ an issue with `\S`. Your umlauts are unrelated. Ah, interesting. You are...

> Can you please test if it works for you? If I still use `footcite`, then I still get an error: ``` Runaway definition? ->\protect \noexpand ! File ended while...

Also, I get an error in my original MWE with `avolcite`: ``` Runaway argument? { ! Paragraph ended before \blx@xsanitizeafter was complete. \par l.40 ! Too many }'s. \blx@citeargs@iii ...>\blx@xsanitizeafter...

Yes, that seems to work. I don't see the error anymore.

Should I change all my `\S` to `\textsection`? Or is there an easier "fix" for `biblatex-sbl`?

Thanks! I had replaced all my `\S` with `\textsection`, but added this to the preamble, change a bunch back to `\S`, and I do not get the error (and the...

Hmmmm interesting. I am not sure SBLHS2 takes a position. I cannot find a single instance in the book where a subsequent reference of a book chapter/section or article (including...

I will add: BUT if SBLHS2 does not take a position and there is a use case where someone _does not_ want a post note or any pages (such as...

Okay, I figured you already knew about it. I'll wait and try it out in the new code :)