folofjc

Hi @dcpurton. Thanks for that! I have now (re)read the blog posts on 2, 3, and 5. My new question(s) is(are) which entry types are used for each of these....

> Yes, there were no examples for BDAG and _HALOT_ in the original handbook and I've really only seen them like you mention. In fact I've never seen a book...

Sorry, you are right, I mean to explain the file in the file, not documentation. That would work great, thanks! That would fit the SBL style manual perfectly!

Okay, I think I found the answer in section 6.4.5 of the `biblatex-sbl-examples` file on page 45. There, the `augustine:letters` has both a `crossref` and a `related`. So I think...

Thanks! I see now. I had misunderstood #119. I thought the solution was not to use both `related` and `crossref`, which is why I was having problems here. But I...

Ha. Just saw my typo in the title for Philo. Ignore that ;)

Oh, I like the new system! One question - is there a reason that the volume could not be added somehow in the `ancienttext`? That way wouldn't have to use...

Good point about the `nocite`, I hadn't thought of that. Since it is a separate `bib` entry, why does it have to be included before the citation of the other...

I can see in your code that anything that is not `ancienttext` is considered "Secondary". But realistically, there are many writings where PG and PL are the best that we...

Just to be clear, I do not get this error with _just_ `biblatex`. If I replace the `biblatex` include line above with only: ``` \usepackage[style=verbose,citepages=omit,citereset=chapter]{biblatex} ``` then I do not...